In , the young philosopher Peter Singer published Famine, Affluence and Morality, which rapidly became one of the most widely discussed essays in. Outline of PETER SINGER: “Famine, Affluence, and Morality”. Singer’s main argument: 1. Lack of food & shelter & medicine is bad. 2. If it is in. Peter Singer. Abstract. As I write this, in November , people are dying in East Bengal from lack of food, shelter, and medical caxc. The suffering and death.

Author: Zulkikus Mumi
Country: Mozambique
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Health and Food
Published (Last): 22 June 2004
Pages: 209
PDF File Size: 9.52 Mb
ePub File Size: 8.72 Mb
ISBN: 321-9-25931-144-6
Downloads: 92030
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Arashimi

His explicit condemnation of those who fail to accept a duty to eschew new faminf or cars for the sake of the poor risks generating resentment. The Ethical Principles of Effective Altruism.

Those who want to contribute to famine relief or poverty alleviation should be free to do so. Global Duties in the Face of Uncertainty. On the Supposed Obligation to Relieve Famine. Gilbert Harman has stated that he considers ‘Famine, Affluence, and Morality’ as one of the most famous articles famjne ethics.

In affluencr Gottlieb Duttweiler Institute ranked him third on its list of Global Thought Leaders, and Time has ranked him among the world’s most influential people. Famine in Applied Ethics. Therefore, we ought to give maximally or at least very much more than we currently do. Cookies on FT Sites We use cookies for a number of reasons, such as keeping FT Sites reliable and secure, personalising content and ads, affulence social media features and to analyse how our Sites are used.

Famine, Affluence, and Morality

It makes no difference whether the person I can help is a neighbor’s child ten yards away from me or a Bengali whose name I shall never know, ten thousand miles away. As I write this, in Novemberpeople are dying in East Bengal from fammine of food, shelter, and medical caxc. His next step is to argue there is no moral difference between letting the child drown and letting one die in a faraway country as a result of extreme poverty.


Instead, it opens the door to our discussion of how far to increase relief. History of Western Philosophy.

Singer gives us the simplest and most powerful argument in modern philosophy that we must change the way we live fundamentally. We should give to the level that does not reduce spending in a consumption-based society like ours below the point that would start to decrease what we have available to give.

In that case, we need to give direct relief now and, in addition, promote population control. A Reply to Singer. By using this site, you agree to the Petter of Use and Privacy Policy.

John Bengson – – Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 86 3: John Kekes – – Philosophy 77 4: At thc government level, no govcrmmcnt has given the sort of massive aid that would enable the refugees to survive fm: He argued that choosing not to send life-saving money to starving people on the other side of the earth is the moral equivalent of neglecting to save drowning children because we prefer not to muddy our shoes.

Spoerl – – American Journal of Jurisprudence 37 1: But in moral terms, Singer argues, the challenge posed is the same. Singer’s Agenda for Applied Ethics. Sign in to use this feature.


Jennifer Lackey – forthcoming – Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.

Peter Singer, Famine, affluence, and morality – PhilPapers

Sign in to use this feature. Hunger in Philosophy of Biology. Find it on Scholar.

The Immorality of Having Children. Search the FT Search. If we can help, we must–and any excuse is hypocrisy. The suffering and death that are occurring there now axe not inevitable, ; unavoidable in any fatalistic sense of the term.

The implication is that the British government values a supersonic transport more than thirty times as. Return to Course Home Page. In fact, it’s a very traditional view; it was advocated by Thomas Aquinas!

Travis Timmerman – – Analysis 75 2: Peter Singer on Famine, Affluence, and Morality: It argues that affluent persons are morally obligated to donate far more resources to humanitarian causes than is considered normal in Western cultures. It casts western philanthropists as heroic saviours of the helpless and those living in dire conditions as passive victims of dire circumstances.

It simply delays additional problems. This attractively packaged, concise edition collects the original article, two of Singer’s more recent popular writings on our obligations to others around the world, and a new introduction by Singer that discusses his current thinking. Singer’s extreme stand on our moral obligations to others became a powerful call to arms and continues to challenge people’s attitudes towards extreme poverty.

Personal Finance Show more Personal Finance links.